METODOLOGI TAFSIR KONTEMPORER (STUDI KOMPARASI ATAS PEMIKIRAN FAZLUR RAHMAN DAN MUHAMMAD SYAHRUR)
Keywords:
Fazlur Rahman, Muhammad Syahrur, Metodologi, Tafsir KontemporerAbstract
The main problem of interpretation is actually the giving of meaning and production of meaning, however, there is a difference between Rahman and about the nature of interpretation, for Rahman the essence of interpretation is how an interpreter is able to find authentic meaning from a text through socio-historical context the past, then capture the moral ideal aspect to contextualize the meaning in the present era with a new methodology. While syahrur, interpretation does not have to be like that, an interpreter, does not have to determine authentic meaning (original meaning) in the past, but can only immediately search for the meaning of the relevant text in the present era, because that meaning can also develop according to contemporary scientific reasoning. The Qur’an must be seen as if it had just come down yesterday and the Prophet had just greeted us. Thus, Fazlur Rahman and Muhammad Sharur are progressive figures of Muslims who carry out reforms as well as deconstruction and reconstruction of the study of the Qur’an’s interpretation in the contemporary era.
References
Abdul Mustaqim dan Sahiron Syamsyudin, Studi Al-Qur’an
Kontemporer, Wacana Baru Berbagai Metodologi Tafsir
(Yogyakarta : Tiara Wacana, 2002
--------------Mustaqim Abdul, Epistimologi Tafsir Kontemporer
Yogyakarta: LkiS, 2012
Ali al ShabuniMuhammad, Shabun, Rawâ’i al-Bayân Tafsir ayat AlAhkâm min al-Qur’an,( ttp. : tth.), jilid. 1
SyamsudinSahiron, Hermeneutika Al-Qur’an Dan Hadist Yogyakarta;
Elsaq Press, 2010
Rahman Fazlur, Islam Dan Moderenitas Tentang Transformasi
Intelektual, Bandung: Pustaka, 1995
dkk,Kurdi, Hermeneutika Al-Qur’an & Al-Hadis, Yogyakarta: eLSAQ
press, 2010
Iyubeny Edi Ah, Berhala-Berhala Wacana: Gagasan
Kontekstualisasi Sakralitas Agama Secara Produktif-Kreatif,
Yogyakarta:IRCISoD.2015
Rahman Fazlur, Framework for interpreting the eticho legal content
of qur’anLondon: The Institute Of Ismail Studies, 2004.




